Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40139457›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025

Protocol for a multisite, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial comparing a brief tele-cognitive behavioral therapy intervention (BRIGHT) with attention control for the reduction of body image-related distress among head and neck cancer survivors.

Evan M Graboyes, Stacey N Maurer, Emily Kistner-Griffin, Kent Armeson, Ella Starr, Taylor McLeod, Wendy E Balliet, Jacquelyn Doenges, Olga Slavin-Spenny, Jessica R Vanderlan and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05442957 (A Multi-Site, Parallel-Group, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing a Brief Tele-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05442957 narecruitingnot on this map

A Multi-Site, Parallel-Group, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing a Brief Tele-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention (BRIGHT) With Attention Control for the Reduction of Body Image-Related Distress Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2023 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsHead and Neck Cancer, Body Image Disturbance, Body Image, SurvivorshipArmsBRIGHT, Attention Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the inventory to measure and assess image disturbance in head and neck cancer (IMAGE-HN).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Evan M GraboyesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America. Electronic address: graboyes@musc.edu.
Stacey N MaurerHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Emily Kistner-GriffinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Kent ArmesonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Ella StarrDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Taylor McLeodDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Wendy E BallietHollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Jacquelyn DoengesHarold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Olga Slavin-SpennyHenry Ford Health Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Medical Group, Detroit, MI, United States of America.
Jessica R VanderlanDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Andrew DayDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Patrik PipkornDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Sidharth V PuramDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Samantha H TamDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Medical Group, Detroit, MI, United States of America; Department of Population Health Sciences, Henry Ford Medical Group, Detroit, MI, United States of America.
Kenneth J RuggieroDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States of America.
Katherine R SterbaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America; Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America.

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI John J Lemasters · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR000062 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2012 to 2014
$9.4M
The South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UM1TR005294 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KATHLEEN T. BRADY, PATRICK A FLUME · 2025 to 2026
$7.6M
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a Novel Treatment Strategy for Body Image-Related Distress Among Head and Neck Cancer SurvivorsR37CA269385 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Evan Michael Graboyes · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000062NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR005294NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NCI NIH HHS R37 CA269385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One in four head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors experience clinically significant body image distress (BID), a devastating psychosocial morbidity that adversely affects quality of life. To date, effective interventions for these patients are lacking. BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head and neck cancer Treatment), a brief cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT), has shown potential efficacy as a novel treatment paradigm for HNC survivors with BID. The primary objective of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) is to test the hypothesis that BRIGHT improves BID among HNC survivors relative to an Attention Control (AC) intervention. In this multisite RCT, N = 180 HNC survivors with BID will be randomized 1:1 to six weeks of BRIGHT or AC of dose and delivery-matched survivorship education. Outcomes are assessed at baseline and 2, 3, 6, and 9-months post-randomization. The primary endpoint is the IMAGE-HN (Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head and Neck) score, a validated patient-reported outcome of HNC-related BID. Secondary endpoints include the HN Shame and Stigma Scale, the PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a, Anxiety 8a, and Ability to Participate in Social Activities 8a, the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation, and the EORTC QLQ-HN35 Trouble with Social Eating and Trouble with Social Contact subscales. The trial will also evaluate whether the effect of BRIGHT on BID is mediated through improvements in automatic thinking and body image coping strategies. Findings from this multisite RCT will provide a rigorous test of the efficacy of BRIGHT as the first evidence-based strategy to manage BID among HNC survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: NCT05442957.

Indexed as

Body ImageCancer SurvivorsCognitive Behavioral TherapyHead and Neck NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelemedicineBody image distressCognitive behavioral therapyHead and neck cancerQuality of lifeSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40139457
PMCPMC12085290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.