Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40139264›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2025

Redefining muscular action: human "adductor" magnus is designed to act primarily for hip "extension" rather than adduction in living young individuals.

Katsuki Takahashi, Hironoshin Tozawa, Raki Kawama, Taku Wakahara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katsuki TakahashiFaculty of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8534-0888
Hironoshin TozawaGraduate School of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.
Raki KawamaFaculty of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.
Taku WakaharaFaculty of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6864-7706

Funding

MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP23K19943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human leg muscles are uniquely enlarged for upright bipedalism, and the adductor magnus is one of the largest muscles. Although this muscle is recognized as a hip adductor, hip adduction torque is not greatly required during human locomotion, such as walking and running. The functional role of this giant muscle remains unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the human adductor magnus acts primarily for hip extension rather than adduction in living young individuals. Utilizing diffusion tensor imaging, we reconstructed fascicles over the entire muscle in 15 young adults at the hip neutral position. We divided the muscle into three portions based on fascicle insertion and examined their three-dimensional architectures. The posterior and anterior-distal portions comprised over 80% of the whole muscle volume and physiological cross-sectional area. These portions demonstrated a longer moment arm for hip extension than adduction. Consequently, the potential torque (maximal torque-generating capacity) of the whole muscle was over twofold greater for hip extension than adduction. The hip extension potential torque was correlated with the maximal hip extension torque measured with a dynamometer. These results highlight the architectural design of the adductor magnus, favoring hip extension over adduction, providing novel insights into its functional role beyond the frontal plane in human locomotor mechanics.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaHipHip JointMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansLocomotionMuscle Strength DynamometerTorqueYoung Adultadductorarchitecturediffusion tensor imaginghumanskeletal muscle

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.