ArticleMethods of information in medicine2024
The Completeness of the Operating Room Data.
Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the operating theater, a large collection of data are collected at each surgical visit. Some of these data are patient information, some is related to resource management, which is linked to hospital finances. Poor quality data lead to poor decisions, impacting patient safety and the continuity of care.The study aimed at evaluating the completeness of the data documented within surgical operations. Based on the results, the goal is to improve data quality and to identify improvement ideas of data management.The study was a quantitative evaluation of 33,684 surgical visits, focusing on data omissions. The organization identified 58 operating room data variables related to visits, procedures, resources, and personnel. Data completeness was evaluated for 36 variables, excluding 47 visits that were missing the "Complete" flag. Data preprocessing was done using Python and Pandas, with pseudonymization of personnel names. Data were analyzed using the R programming language. Data omissions were coded as "1" for missing values and "0" for others. Summary variables were created to indicate the number of personnel and procedure and data omissions per visit.The average completeness of the operating room data was 98%, which is considered excellent. However, seven variables-the start and end date and time of anesthesia, the type of treatment, personnel group, and assistant information-had completeness below the 95% target level. A total of 34% of the surgical visits contained at least one data omission. In the yearly comparison, the completeness values of variables were statistically significantly higher in 2022 compared with 2023.By ensuring existing quality assurance practices, verifying internal data maintenance and verifying and standardizing documenting practices the organization can achieve net benefits through improved data completeness, thus enhancing patient records, financial information, and management. Improved data quality will also benefit national and international registers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.