ReviewAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Consensus guidelines for assessing eligibility of pathogenic DNA variants for antisense oligonucleotide treatments.
Review in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- From N-of-1 therapy to health-system implementation.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Article
- Individualized antisense oligonucleotide treatment eligibility of patients living with neurodevelopmental diseases.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Review
- Novel deep intronic variant in CLCN1 causing autosomal recessive myotonia congenita.Neurogenetics · 2026Article
- Precision Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapy Amenability for Infantile Genetic Epilepsies.JAMA neurology · 2026Article
- Translating transcriptomics analysis into diagnostic workflows: clinical variant identification and interpretation in hypothesis-driven and hypothesis-free approaches.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Allele-specific antisense oligonucleotide treatment rescuesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Strategic consensus on the clinical translation of advanced therapies in paediatric rare neurological disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- The impact of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapeutics on the future of rare disease drug discovery.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2026Article
- RNA-Based Therapies for Inherited Metabolic Disorders.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
- A xenotransplantation model for reactivation of paternal UBE3A using human-specific antisense oligonucleotides.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Academic Medical Centers in Personalized Experimental Therapeutic Development: Key Considerations.Neurology · 2026Review
- Article
- Antisense oligonucleotide therapy mitigates autosomal dominant progressive hearing loss in a murine model of human DFNA2.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Implementing a consultation service for translating genomic research findings into the clinic: Lessons from the SickKids Genome Board.Paediatrics & child health · 2025Article
- The N=1 Collaborative: advancing customized nucleic acid therapies through collaboration and data sharing.Nucleic acids research · 2025Review
- The space-time continuum in neurological disorders of the autophagosome-lysosome fusion machinery.Autophagy reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Of the around 7,000 known rare diseases worldwide, disease-modifying treatments are available for fewer than 5%, leaving millions of individuals without specialized therapeutic strategies. In recent years, antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) have shown promise as individualized genetic interventions for rare genetic diseases. However, there is currently no consensus on which disease-causing DNA variants are suitable candidates for this type of genetic therapy. The patient identification working group of the N=1 Collaborative (N1C), alongside an international group of volunteer assessors, has developed and piloted consensus guidelines for assessing the eligibility of pathogenic DNA variants for ASO treatments. We herein present the N1C VARIANT (variant assessments toward eligibility for antisense oligonucleotide treatment) guidelines, including the guiding scientific principles and our approach to consensus building. Pathogenic, disease-causing variants can be assessed for the three currently best-established ASO treatment approaches: splice correction, exon skipping, and downregulation of RNA transcripts. A genetic variant is classified as "eligible," "likely eligible," "unlikely eligible," or "not eligible" in relation to the different approaches or as "unable to assess." We also review key considerations related to assessing the upregulation of transcripts from the wild-type allele, an emerging ASO therapeutic strategy. We provide additional tools and training materials to enable clinicians and researchers to use these guidelines for their eligibility assessments. With this initial edition of our N1C VARIANT guidelines, we provide the rare genetic disease community with guidance on how to identify suitable candidates for variant-specific ASO-based therapies and the possibility of integrating such assessments into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.