ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
A case report of a misdiagnosed type I vaginal agenesis review.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceType I Vaginal agenesis presents with a range of clinical symptoms, including primary amenorrhea and periodic abdominal pain; in severe cases, it may also cause difficulty in urination, complicating the diagnosis. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report details the diagnostic journey of a 12-year-old girl who was repeatedly misdiagnosed due to "periodic abdominal pain and difficulty in urination" and ultimately diagnosed with Type I vaginal agenesis. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: After several hospitals failed to determine the cause, our department diagnosed her with Type I vaginal agenesis and she underwent standard surgical treatment to restore physiological function.
conclusionThis report underscores the critical importance of early and accurate diagnosis of this rare condition, and highlights the effectiveness of appropriate surgical intervention and thorough postoperative care, aiming to guide the clinical management of similar cases in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.