ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Decomposition and Comparative Analysis of Urban-Rural Disparities in eHealth Literacy Among Chinese University Students: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- WhatsApp-Supported Teledentistry to Reinforce Oral Health Promotion Among Older Adults Residing in Rural and Urban Areas: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Health-Seeking Behaviors After Acute Respiratory Infection Among Urban and Rural Residents and Different Age Groups: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Health behaviors, physical activity, and subjective well-being: rural-urban inequities among double first-class university graduate students in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Interplay Between Self-Determination and Cognitive Bias: Nonlinear Associations Between Myopia Control Knowledge Reserve and Parental Communication Preparedness.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Analysis of influencing factors and urban-rural difference decomposition of mental health literacy among residents in Chongqing, Southwest China: a large-scale multistage random sampling survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Gender disparities in eHealth literacy among Chinese university students and their decomposition.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- eHealth literacy, health self-efficacy, and health-promoting lifestyle among vocational college students: a latent profile and mediation analysis study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Family caregivers' willingness to use online psychological therapy for individuals with mental illness in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association Between Exercise Behavior Stages and Obesity Transition in Children and Adolescents: A Nationwide Follow-Up Study.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Decomposition analysis of anxiety symptom differences between urban and rural Chinese university students: cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMobile health care is rapidly expanding in China, making the enhancement of eHealth literacy a crucial strategy for improving public health. However, the persistent urban-rural divide may contribute to disparities in eHealth literacy between urban and rural university students, potentially affecting their health-related behaviors and outcomes.
objectiveThis study aims to examine disparities in eHealth literacy between university students in urban and rural China, identifying key influencing factors and their contributions. The findings will help bridge these gaps, promote social equity, enhance overall health and well-being, and inform future advancements in the digital health era.
methodsThe eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) was used to assess eHealth literacy levels among 7230 university students from diverse schools and majors across 10 regions, including Guangdong Province, Shanghai Municipality, and Jiangsu Province. Descriptive statistics summarized demographic, sociological, and lifestyle characteristics. Chi-square tests examined the distribution of eHealth literacy between urban and rural students. A binary logistic regression model identified key influencing factors, while a Fairlie decomposition model quantified their contributions to the observed disparities.
resultsThe average eHealth literacy score among Chinese university students was 29.22 (SD 6.68), with 4135 out of 7230 (57.19%) scoring below the passing mark. Rural students had a significantly higher proportion of inadequate eHealth literacy (2837/4510, 62.90%) compared with urban students (1298/2720, 47.72%; P<.001). The Fairlie decomposition analysis showed that 71.4% of the disparity in eHealth literacy was attributable to urban-rural factors and unobserved variables, while 28.6% resulted from observed factors. The primary contributors were monthly per capita household income (13.4%), exercise habits (11.7%), and 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores (2.1%).
conclusionsRural university students exhibit lower eHealth literacy levels than their urban counterparts, a disparity influenced by differences in socioeconomic status, individual lifestyles, and personal health status. These findings highlight the need for targeted intervention strategies, including (1) improving access to eHealth resources in rural and underserved areas; (2) fostering an environment that encourages physical activity to promote healthy behaviors; (3) expanding school-based mental health services to enhance health information processing capacity; and (4) implementing systematic eHealth literacy training with ongoing evaluation. These strategies will support equitable access to and utilization of eHealth resources for all students, regardless of their geographic location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.