Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138679›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

An Interpretable Model With Probabilistic Integrated Scoring for Mental Health Treatment Prediction: Design Study.

Anthony Kelly, Esben Kjems Jensen, Eoin Martino Grua, Kim Mathiasen, Pepijn Van de Ven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony KellyDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1798-1506
Esben Kjems JensenCenter for Digital Psykiatri, Forskningsenhed, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9689-3776
Eoin Martino GruaDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-4338
Kim MathiasenDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6067-8866
Pepijn Van de VenDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3321-450X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) systems in health care have the potential to enhance decision-making but often fail to address critical issues such as prediction explainability, confidence, and robustness in a context-based and easily interpretable manner.

objectiveThis study aimed to design and evaluate an ML model for a future decision support system for clinical psychopathological treatment assessments. The novel ML model is inherently interpretable and transparent. It aims to enhance clinical explainability and trust through a transparent, hierarchical model structure that progresses from questions to scores to classification predictions. The model confidence and robustness were addressed by applying Monte Carlo dropout, a probabilistic method that reveals model uncertainty and confidence.

methodsA model for clinical psychopathological treatment assessments was developed, incorporating a novel ML model structure. The model aimed at enhancing the graphical interpretation of the model outputs and addressing issues of prediction explainability, confidence, and robustness. The proposed ML model was trained and validated using patient questionnaire answers and demographics from a web-based treatment service in Denmark (N=1088).

resultsThe balanced accuracy score on the test set was 0.79. The precision was ≥0.71 for all 4 prediction classes (depression, panic, social phobia, and specific phobia). The area under the curve for the 4 classes was 0.93, 0.92, 0.91, and 0.98, respectively.

conclusionsWe have demonstrated a mental health treatment ML model that supported a graphical interpretation of prediction class probability distributions. Their spread and overlap can inform clinicians of competing treatment possibilities for patients and uncertainty in treatment predictions. With the ML model achieving 79% balanced accuracy, we expect that the model will be clinically useful in both screening new patients and informing clinical interviews.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMachine LearningMental DisordersModels, StatisticalAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAIartificial intelligenceexplainabilityexplainable AImachine learningmental healthMonte Carlo dropoutXAI

Identifiers

PMID40138679
PMCPMC11982765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.