Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138664›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2025

Discourse Measures From the Modern Cookie Theft Picture Description Are Sensitive to Mild Communication Deficits Not Captured by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient.

Lisa D Bunker, Shauna K Berube, Voss Neal, Lindsey Kelly, Catherine Kelly, Erin L Meier, Argye E Hillis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Acute-Phase Machine Learning Prediction of 12-Month Aphasia and Discourse Recovery.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Revisiting Western Aphasia Battery-Revised in the Context of Mild Impairment.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026
    Article
  5. Rapid Lexical Retrieval and Executive Functioning in Very Mild Aphasia.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa D BunkerSpeech-Language Pathology Program, College of Health Sciences, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ.ORCID 0000-0001-9637-3204
Shauna K BerubeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-1344-1353
Voss NealDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Lindsey KellyDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Catherine KellyCognitive Recovery Lab, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Erin L MeierDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-5750-597X
Argye E HillisDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-5192-1171

Funding

Telerehab for Aphasia (TERRA)P50DC014664 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BONILHA, LEONARDO F · 2016 to 2025
$25.0M
Neural Basis of Lexical Deficits in Hyperacute StrokeR01DC005375 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Argye E. Hillis · 2002 to 2026
$11.8M
The Neural Basis of Impaired Affective Prosody in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal DegenerationR01DC015466 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HILLIS, ARGYE E. · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC014664NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005375NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) is often used for diagnosis of aphasia. However, persons scoring above the WAB-R diagnostic cutoff may still present with language difficulties indicative of aphasia. Identification of residual language challenges is critical for treatment referral or inclusion in research. We examined differences in discourse following acute left-hemisphere stroke for those above/below the WAB-R diagnostic cutoff compared to healthy controls, as well as recovery during the first year.

methodSixty-eight participants with acute left-hemisphere stroke completed the WAB-R and were classified as

resultsWilcoxon tests showed differences between healthy controls and ABW or NABW on all MCT metrics except efficiency for those NABW. Regression models showed no main effects of group or interaction between group and time point.

conclusionsThe NABW group showed deficits in verbal output, content production, and laterality on the MCT picture description task, suggesting the presence of possible aphasia and hemispatial neglect. Measures derived from the MCT may be more sensitive to residual language/communication difficulties not captured by the WAB-R. The NABW group also showed similar patterns of recovery as the ABW group, highlighting the MCT task's ability to capture change for those with mild impairments. Results support use of the MCT task in clinical settings, particularly if/when mild deficits are probable/suspected. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.28608116.

Indexed as

AphasiaCommunication DisordersLanguage TestsStrokeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID40138664
PMCPMC12502441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.