ArticlePLOS digital health2025
A flexible framework for minimal biomarker signature discovery from clinical omics studies without library size normalisation.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Application of transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics technologies to clinical cohorts has uncovered a variety of signatures for predicting disease. Many of these signatures require the full 'omics data for evaluation on unseen samples, either explicitly or implicitly through library size normalisation. Translation to low-cost point-of-care tests requires development of signatures which measure as few analytes as possible without relying on direct measurement of library size. To achieve this, we have developed a feature selection method (Forward Selection-Partial Least Squares) which generates minimal disease signatures from high-dimensional omics datasets with applicability to continuous, binary or multi-class outcomes. Through extensive benchmarking, we show that FS-PLS has comparable performance to commonly used signature discovery methods while delivering signatures which are an order of magnitude smaller. We show that FS-PLS can be used to select features predictive of library size, and that these features can be used to normalize unseen samples, meaning that the features in the complete model can be measured in isolation for making new predictions. By enabling discovery of small, high-performance signatures, FS-PLS addresses an important impediment for the further development of precision medical care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.