Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138365›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploiting a natural instance of vertebrate-posed chemical aposematism for tick bite prevention: Repellency of Ixodes scapularis with (E)-Oct-2-enal.

Eric L Siegel, Sophia Goodnow, Lucy Thompson, Sarah Nicolson, Elizabeth MacLeod, Andrew Y Li, Guang Xu, Stephen M Rich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eric L SiegelLaboratory of Medical Zoology, Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8226-811X
Sophia GoodnowLaboratory of Medical Zoology, Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lucy ThompsonLaboratory of Medical Zoology, Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sarah NicolsonLaboratory of Medical Zoology, Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Elizabeth MacLeodLaboratory of Medical Zoology, Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Andrew Y LiUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Guang XuLaboratory of Medical Zoology, Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Stephen M RichLaboratory of Medical Zoology, Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7175-6380

Funding

ACL HHS U01CK000661NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks are medically important, nuisance arthropods found worldwide. Applications of semiochemical-based tick repellents for personal protection and reproductive/reservoir host-targeted tick interventions are understudied. We evaluated the repellency of a semiochemical allomone of donkey sebum, (E)-oct-2-enal, against adult Ixodes scapularis ticks - the most frequent human-biting tick in the United States. Ticks were exposed to 20% solutions of (E)-oct-2-enal or DEET. A filter paper bioassay was applied under laboratory conditions. Behaviour was observed for 10-min and captured with a tracking software. Changes in velocity and peregrination were assessed relative to negative (ethanol) control groups using multivariable robust regression models. Repellent longevity was defined by preventing ticks from crossing the treated surface and was evaluated as time-to-event data with a Cox proportional hazard regression model. Significant reductions in velocity, increases in peregrination, and strong longevity were observed for both repellents. Overall assessment of repellency indexes with a Principal Component Analysis showed that DEET and (E)-oct-2-enal were more effective against male ticks than female ticks. There was no difference in effect on females for each repellent. However, the repellency index for male ticks exposed to (E)-oct-2-enal was significantly greater than DEET. This represents the first report, to our knowledge, of the repellency of a natural, vertebrate-emitted semiochemical against I. scapularis ticks. Work is needed to understand the underlying mechanism of action of semiochemical repellents. The development of (E)-oct-2-enal formulations for practical use in personal protection or reproductive/reservoir host-targeted tick control products warrants further consideration.

Indexed as

AldehydesInsect RepellentsIxodesPheromonesTick BitesAnimalsDEETFemaleHumansMaleAldehydesDEETInsect RepellentsPheromones

Identifiers

PMID40138365
PMCPMC11940652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.