ArticlePloS one2025
Exploiting a natural instance of vertebrate-posed chemical aposematism for tick bite prevention: Repellency of Ixodes scapularis with (E)-Oct-2-enal.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of a novel tick attractant and repellent activity of essential oils from sweet fern, Comptonia peregrina (L.) Coult.Experimental & applied acarology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ticks are medically important, nuisance arthropods found worldwide. Applications of semiochemical-based tick repellents for personal protection and reproductive/reservoir host-targeted tick interventions are understudied. We evaluated the repellency of a semiochemical allomone of donkey sebum, (E)-oct-2-enal, against adult Ixodes scapularis ticks - the most frequent human-biting tick in the United States. Ticks were exposed to 20% solutions of (E)-oct-2-enal or DEET. A filter paper bioassay was applied under laboratory conditions. Behaviour was observed for 10-min and captured with a tracking software. Changes in velocity and peregrination were assessed relative to negative (ethanol) control groups using multivariable robust regression models. Repellent longevity was defined by preventing ticks from crossing the treated surface and was evaluated as time-to-event data with a Cox proportional hazard regression model. Significant reductions in velocity, increases in peregrination, and strong longevity were observed for both repellents. Overall assessment of repellency indexes with a Principal Component Analysis showed that DEET and (E)-oct-2-enal were more effective against male ticks than female ticks. There was no difference in effect on females for each repellent. However, the repellency index for male ticks exposed to (E)-oct-2-enal was significantly greater than DEET. This represents the first report, to our knowledge, of the repellency of a natural, vertebrate-emitted semiochemical against I. scapularis ticks. Work is needed to understand the underlying mechanism of action of semiochemical repellents. The development of (E)-oct-2-enal formulations for practical use in personal protection or reproductive/reservoir host-targeted tick control products warrants further consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.