Observational studyPloS one2025
Long-term prognosis after coronary bifurcation PCI-A nationwide observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for bifurcation lesions are underexplored. We investigated long-term PCI outcomes for proximal LAD bifurcation lesions involving D1.
methodsUsing Swedish registries, we included all patients undergoing LAD-D1 bifurcation PCI with drug-eluting stents between 2010 and 2020. Patients were stratified into two groups: simple PCI and complex PCI. The simple PCI group included those with stents in the proximal LAD only, while complex PCI involved the kissing balloon technique or a 2-stent approach for the proximal LAD and D1. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to estimate event rates of major adverse clinical events (MACE), defined as all-cause death or a new myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included target segment revascularization or coronary artery by-pass graft surgery (CABG) and definite stent thrombosis.
resultsA total of 6,796 individuals were analyzed: 2,007 underwent complex PCI and 4,789 simple PCI. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The complex PCI group was slightly younger, more often male, and more frequently taking statins. At 1-year, MACE rates were lower in the complex PCI group (6.2% vs 7.9%; adjusted HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93, p = 0.010). The result was driven by lower all-cause mortality (3.6% vs. 5.0%; adjusted HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.98, p = 0.036). No significant differences in myocardial infarction, target segment revascularization, CABG, stent thrombosis, stroke, or bleeding were observed between groups, persisting at five years.
conclusionOver a five-year period, complex PCI of LAD/D1 bifurcation lesions was associated with better outcome than simple PCI in a routine clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.