Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138347›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

In situ cavitation bubble manometry reveals a lack of light-activated guard cell turgor modulation in bryophytes.

Craig R Brodersen, Tim J Brodribb, Uri Hochberg, N Michele Holbrook, Scott A M McAdam, Joseph Zailaa, Brett A Huggett, Philippe Marmottant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. In situ cavitation bubble manometry reveals a lack of light-activated guard cell turgor modulation in bryophytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Craig R BrodersenSchool of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.ORCID 0000-0002-0924-2570
Tim J BrodribbDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia.
Uri HochbergAgricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Neve Ya'ar research station, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel.
N Michele HolbrookDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.ORCID 0000-0003-3325-5395
Scott A M McAdamPurdue Center for Plant Biology, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-6750
Joseph ZailaaSchool of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511.
Brett A HuggettDepartment of Biology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME 04240.
Philippe MarmottantLaboratoire de Spectrométrie Physique, UMR 5588, Université Grenoble I and CNRS, Martin d'Hères Cedex 1 F-38402, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6828-6656

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2333889United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) 2333889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversification of plant hydraulic architecture and stomatal function coincides with radical changes in the Earth's atmosphere over the past 400 my. Due to shared stomatal anatomy with the earliest land plants, bryophyte stomatal behavior may provide insights into the evolution of stomatal function, but significant uncertainty remains due to technical limitations of measuring guard cell turgor pressure in situ. Here, we introduce a method for monitoring cell turgor pressure by nucleating microbubbles within the guard cells of intact plant tissue and then examining microbubble growth and dissolution dynamics. First, we show that maximum microbubble radius decreases with increasing pressure as the pressure of the surrounding fluid constrains its growth according to a modified version of the Epstein-Plesset equation. We then apply this method to monitor turgor pressure in dark- vs. light-acclimated guard cells across bryophyte taxa with stomata, where their role in gas-exchange remains ambiguous, and in vascular plants with well-documented light-dependent turgor modulation. Our findings show no light-activated change in turgor in bryophyte guard cells, with pressures not significantly different than neighboring epidermal cells. In contrast, vascular plants show distinct pressure modulation in response to light that drives reversible changes in stomatal aperture. Complete guard cell turgor loss had no effect on bryophyte stomatal aperture but resulted in partial or complete closure in vascular plants. These results suggest that despite conserved stomatal morphology, the sampled bryophytes lack dynamic control over guard cell turgor that is critical for sustaining photosynthesis and inhibiting desiccation.

Indexed as

BryophytaPlant StomataLightMicrobubblesPressurebryophyteguard cellsstomataturgor pressurevascular plant

Identifiers

PMID40138347
PMCPMC12002306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.