Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138346›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Bridging the human-AI knowledge gap through concept discovery and transfer in AlphaZero.

Lisa Schut, Nenad Tomašev, Thomas McGrath, Demis Hassabis, Ulrich Paquet, Been Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa SchutOxford Applied and Theoretical Machine Learning Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-6760-5879
Nenad TomaševGoogle DeepMind, London N1C 4AG, United Kingdom.
Thomas McGrathGoodfire AI, San Francisco, CA 94102.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-6888
Demis HassabisGoogle DeepMind, London N1C 4AG, United Kingdom.
Ulrich PaquetGoogle DeepMind, London N1C 4AG, United Kingdom.
Been KimGoogle DeepMind, Mountain View, CA 94043.ORCID 0000-0001-9938-2915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AI systems have attained superhuman performance across various domains. If the hidden knowledge encoded in these highly capable systems can be leveraged, human knowledge and performance can be advanced. Yet, this internal knowledge is difficult to extract. Due to the vast space of possible internal representations, searching for meaningful new conceptual knowledge can be like finding a needle in a haystack. Here, we introduce a method that extracts new chess concepts from AlphaZero, an AI system that mastered chess via self-play without human supervision. Our method excavates vectors that represent concepts from AlphaZero's internal representations using convex optimization, and filters the concepts based on teachability (whether the concept is transferable to another AI agent) and novelty (whether the concept contains information not present in human chess games). These steps ensure that the discovered concepts are useful and meaningful. For the resulting set of concepts, prototypes (chess puzzle-solution pairs) are presented to experts for final validation. In a preliminary human study, four top chess grandmasters (all former or current world chess champions) were evaluated on their ability to solve concept prototype positions. All grandmasters showed improvement after the learning phase, suggesting that the concepts are at the frontier of human understanding. Despite the small scale, our result is a proof of concept demonstrating the possibility of leveraging knowledge from a highly capable AI system to advance the frontier of human knowledge; a development that could bear profound implications and shape how we interact with AI systems across many applications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceKnowledgeHumansAIconcept discoverymachine learningreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40138346
PMCPMC12002201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.