ArticlePloS one2025
High resolution tissue and cell type identification via single cell transcriptomic profiling.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue identification can be instrumental in reconstructing a crime scene but remains a challenging task in forensic investigations. Conventionally, identifying the presence of certain tissue from tissue mixture by predefined cell type markers in bulk fashion is challenging due to limitations in sensitivity and accuracy. In contrast, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) is a promising technology that has the potential to enhance or even revolutionize tissue and cell type identification. In this study, we developed a high sensitive general purpose single cell annotation pipeline, scTissueID, to accurately evaluate the single cell profile quality and precisely determine the cell and tissue types based on scRNA profiles. By incorporating a crucial and unique reference cell quality differentiation phase of targeting only high confident cells as reference, scTissueID achieved better and consistent performance in determining cell and tissue types compared to 8 state-of-art single cell annotation pipelines and 6 widely adopted machine learning algorithms, as demonstrated through a large-scale and comprehensive comparison study using both forensic-relevant and Human Cell Atlas (HCA) data. We highlighted the significance of cell quality differentiation, a previously undervalued factor. Thus, this study offers a tool capable of accurately and efficiently identifying cell and tissue types, with broad applicability to forensic investigations and other biomedical research endeavors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.