Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138327›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Limited knowledge of health risks along the illegal wild meat value chain in the Nairobi Metropolitan Area (NMA).

Sherril Phyllis Masudi, James Hassell, Elizabeth AnneJessie Cook, Pim van Hooft, Frank van Langevelde, Ralph Buij, Moses Yongo Otiende, Joel Winyo Ochieng, Andrea Santangeli, Anise Happi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sherril Phyllis MasudiWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-6319-1211
James HassellSmithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington DC, United States of America.
Elizabeth AnneJessie CookInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6081-8363
Pim van HooftWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Frank van LangeveldeWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Ralph BuijAnimal Ecology Group, Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Moses Yongo OtiendeWildlife research and Training Institute, Naivasha, Kenya.
Joel Winyo OchiengUniversity of Nairobi, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Nairobi, Kenya.
Andrea SantangeliAnimal Demography and Ecology Unit, Institute for Mediterranean Studies (IMEDEA), Esporles, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0273-1977
Anise HappiAfrican Center of Excellence for Genomics of Infectious Diseases, Ede, Nigeria.
Samuel Nsikan AkpanWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Lian Francesca ThomasInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-8447-1210

Funding

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH (GIZ) through Wageningen UniversityGerman Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development through the One Health Research, Education and Outreach Centre in Africa (OHRECA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption of and trade in wild meat could result in infectious pathogen spillover into human populations. Such spillovers could propagate into sustained outbreaks in major cities where human aggregations potentially catalyze their spread. A better understanding of how urban wild meat value chains operate could assist in mitigating spillover events. We used key informant interviews and literature review to understand the structure and operations, actors, their practices, and health risk perceptions along a wild meat value chain supplying a rapidly urbanizing city in Africa, the Nairobi Metropolitan Area (NMA). The value chain operates via three main nodes: harvester, trader, and consumer nodes. We found wild meat to be harvested from peri-urban areas of the NMA, consumed or sold locally, or supplied to distant urban markets. Actors reported increased participation along the value chain during the dry season, and over the Christmas period. The value chain operated informally, creating a 'rules in use' framework focusing on sanction avoidance, while ignoring food safety concerns. Consequently, respondents reported slaughtering wild animals on the bare ground, handling wild meat with unwashed hands and uncleaned utensils. No value chain actors reported wearing personal protective equipment when handling wild meat. At the distant markets' trader node where wild meat was sold as livestock meat, meat vendors engaged in similar unsafe practices. Actors had limited awareness of the specific health risks from wild meat. We speculate that the observed limited health risk awareness, and sanction avoidance attempts promotes unsafe practices during exploitation of wild animals for food, income and for medicinal purposes. Multisectoral efforts at the conservation and public health nexus, as well as community education on the potential health risks from wild meat are key in reducing potential spillovers.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMeatAnimalsAnimals, WildCitiesHumansKenya

Identifiers

PMID40138327
PMCPMC11940438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.