Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138300›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Assessment of physical activity patterns in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the UK Biobank.

Valentin Hamy, Andrew Creagh, Luis Garcia-Gancedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valentin HamyGSK, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9411-4751
Andrew CreaghUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Luis Garcia-GancedoGSK, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5631-1711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures of physical activity patterns that may characterize rheumatoid arthritis status were investigated, using actigraphy data from a large, prospective database study (UK Biobank). Population characterization identified 1080 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis who participated in accelerometer-measured physical activity data collection and met the eligibility criteria; these individuals were subsequently matched with 2160 non-rheumatoid arthritis controls. Raw actigraphy data were pre-processed to interpretable acceleration magnitude and general signal-based features were used to derive activity labels from a human activity recognition model. Qualitative assessment of average activity profiles indicated small differences between groups for activity in the first 5 hours of the day, engagement in moderate-to-vigorous activity, and evening sleep patterns. Of 145 metrics capturing different aspects of physical activity, 57 showed an ability to differentiate between participants with rheumatoid arthritis and non-rheumatoid arthritis controls, most notably activities related to moderate-to-vigorous activity, sleep and the ability to perform sustained activity, which remained different when adjusting for baseline imbalances. Objective measures derived from wrist-worn accelerometer data may be used to assess and quantify the impact of rheumatoid arthritis on daily activity and may reflect rheumatoid arthritis symptoms. This work represents an initial step towards the characterization of such impact. Importantly, this study offers a glimpse of the potential use of large-scale datasets to support the analysis of smaller clinical study datasets.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidExerciseAccelerometryActigraphyAdultAgedBiological Specimen BanksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSleepUK BiobankUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40138300
PMCPMC11940758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.