ArticlePloS one2025
Current velocity, water quality, and benthic taxa as predictors for coral recruitment rates on the Great Barrier Reef.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coral reefs worldwide are experiencing frequent disturbances, rendering coral recruitment critical for population recovery. This large-scale study identifies environmental, spatial, and biotic drivers of coral recruit densities at 141 stations stratified across seven regions and three depths (1, 5, and 15 m depths) with contrasting environmental conditions across and along the Great Barrier Reef and the Torres Strait. Settlement tiles were deployed for two years, with coral densities and benthic cover quantified following retrieval. Benthic communities were assessed from tile images using the point-classification AI program ReefCloud. Environmental data were derived from in situ readings and environmental models. Across all sites, coral recruit densities averaged 187 ± 12 m‒2 (SE), with region-wide averages ranging from 43.5 ± 12 m‒2 to 247 ± 32 m‒2. Mean densities were 3-fold higher in the four clear-water regions compared to the three turbid-water regions. Boosted regression tree analyses showed that densities declined with increasing current velocity, sedimentation, and depth, and increased with increasing pH. From lowest to highest observed levels of current velocity, recruit densities declined by ~ 530 m‒2. From lowest to highest sedimentation, densities declined by ~ 300 recruits m‒2. Even relatively minor increases in sediment deposits from 0.1 to 38 mg cm‒2 were associated with a monotonic decline of ~ 130 recruits m‒2. Recruit densities were also weakly positively related to the cover of turf and crustose coralline algae on tile tops, and negatively related to fleshy invertebrate cover on the tile undersides. Some variation in the cover of these benthic taxa was also related to environmental conditions (e.g., sedimentation and currents), suggesting the possibility of additional indirect environmental effects on recruit densities. Our results highlight the strong role of current velocity and water quality as regulators of coral recruitment success, likely influencing the capacity of reef sites to recover after a disturbance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.