ArticlePloS one2025
Does experience matter? Understanding the mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship: Learning-by-doing or economies of scale.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the underlying mechanism of the volume-outcome relationship, namely learning-by-doing and scale economies in patients with sepsis. DESIGN AND STUDY
settingRetrospective cohort study of adult patients with sepsis between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016 in 231 intensive care units (ICUs) in the UK.
participantsThe patient was the primary unit of analysis. Patient and ICU characteristics were included for risk adjustment. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) Case Mix Programme database. STUDY
designWe used the lags of quarterly sepsis volume in the ICU as a measure of the learning-by-doing effect. OUTCOME MEASURE: The outcome of hospital mortality after ICU admission for sepsis was assessed using a multilevel probit regression model of patients nested in ICUs over quarters. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
methodsCritically ill patients with sepsis were identified by the Sepsis-3 consensus criteria.
resultsOur study identified a cohort of 273001 patients with sepsis admitted to 231 ICUs in the UK. Our study finds that in comparison with contemporaneous volume, lagged volume had a stronger association with acute hospital mortality. This implies that the dynamic learning-by-doing effect is more important than the static economies of scale effect. This finding was consistent across alternate specifications of learning-by-doing.
conclusionsThe study provides evidence that the underlying mechanism for the volume-outcome relationship is learning-by-doing and not the static economies of scale. ICUs caring for patients with sepsis tend to improve by experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.