Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138217›Full record

ReviewEndocrine-related cancer2025

Genomic testing for RET in the clinic: UK and global perspective.

Louise Izatt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine-related cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. RETurn of the Gene. Post scriptum.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: RET is a key oncogene in neuroendocrine cancer. Pathogenic germline variants lead to multiple different phenotypes, including multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), Hirschsprung disease and kidney malformations. Pathogenic somatic variants are also associated with MTC, and RET rearrangements are observed in papillary thyroid cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and pan-cancer syndromes. Testing for both germline and somatic variants is now feasible in everyday clinical practice, and their identification has important clinical consequences, both for affected individuals and their families. This mini-review will discuss current germline and somatic testing strategies in the UK and worldwide, as well as reporting and test outcomes (including variants of uncertain significance or incidental findings). It will explore actions following identification of a pathogenic germline variant, including predictive, reproductive and childhood testing, and somatic testing of RET variants in solid tumours informing personalised cancer treatment. Finally, it will discuss the challenge of delivering rapid and equitable access to genomic testing to ensure that all individuals can benefit promptly and appropriately to improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retHumansUnited KingdomProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humangenomic testMEN2MTCpathogenic variantRET

Identifiers

PMID40138217
PMCPMC12020483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.