ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Successful rapid desensitization to zoledronic acid in a multiple myeloma patient.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy characterized by the proliferation of abnormal plasma cells in the bone marrow, leading to osteolytic lesions. This condition is accompanied by a serum accumulation of monoclonal immunoglobulin. Zoledronic acid (ZA) is a new-generation bisphosphonate commonly used to prevent bone complications. However, allergic reactions can pose challenges, potentially leading to ZA discontinuation. Thus, rapid desensitization (RD) has been proposed as a solution to continue treatment in patients with severe HR. RD consists in the induction of a temporary state of tolerance by administering increasing doses of the offending medication.
methodsWe present the case of a 57-year-old woman with MM who developed face angioedema, flushing with itching, dizziness and fever to ZA. Thus, an allergy work-up with skin prick test and intradermal test (IDT) with ZA were performed. Subsequently, considering the necessity of maintaining ZA treatment, a 3-dilution, 12-step RD infusion protocol was implemented. Skin tests were also repeated after three RD infusions.
resultsSkin tests showed positive IDT reactions to ZA confirming the hypersensitivity state of the patient to the medication. Then, the patient underwent RD procedures without any HR. Skin tests performed after three RD procedures were deemed negative.
conclusionsHere, we demonstrate successful management with RD in an MM patient with HR to ZA, providing a valuable therapeutic option for patients experiencing such reactions. The effectiveness of RD to ZA was confirmed by the negative response to skin tests after 3 RD procedures. Nevertheless, further research is needed to refine RD protocols and establish their safety and efficacy for patients with HR to ZA. Standardized in vitro testing may also improve the diagnosis and management of ZA hypersensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.