Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138072›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2025

Developing a novel measure of non-rigid, ductile spatial skill.

Grace Bennett-Pierre, Thomas F Shipley, Nora S Newcombe, Elizabeth A Gunderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grace Bennett-PierreCIRES Center for Education, Engagement, and Evaluation, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. grace.bennett-pierre@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7857-3114
Thomas F ShipleyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8397-2486
Nora S NewcombeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7044-6046
Elizabeth A GundersonDepartment of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7108-2283

Funding

James S. McDonnell Foundation 220020546National Science Foundation 1760144New America Learning Sciences Exchange FellowshipTemple University Public Policy Lab Graduate Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-rigid spatial thinking, or mental transformations where the distance between two points in an object changes (e.g., folding, breaking, bending), is required for many STEM fields but remains critically understudied. We developed and tested a non-rigid, ductile spatial skill measure based on reasoning about knots with 279 US adults (M = 30.90, SD 5.47 years; 76% White; 48% women). The resultant 54-item measure had good reliability (α = .88). Next, 147 US adults (M = 20.65, SD 2.80 years; 48% White; 56% women) completed existing spatial skills measures, the knot reasoning measure, a verbal skill measure, and surveys of current and childhood spatial activities. Knot reasoning performance was significantly, positively correlated with existing measures of spatial skill. Mental rotation and paper folding, but not bending, predicted knot reasoning task performance. We replicated work showing that men performed better than women on mental rotation and unexpectedly found that men also outperformed women on paper folding and knot reasoning, but not bending, tasks. Using structural equation modeling, we found several significant mediation effects. Men who reported less masculine-stereotyped spatial activity engagement had higher performance on the mental rotation and knot reasoning tasks. Women who reported greater engagement in feminine-stereotyped spatial activities had higher paper folding and backwards knot reasoning performance. Spatial skills did not differ among math-intensive STEM, non-math-intensive STEM, and non-STEM majors. The studies introduce a reliable measure of non-rigid, ductile string transformations and provide initial evidence of the role of gender and gendered spatial activities on non-rigid spatial skills.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSpace PerceptionThinkingAdultFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSex FactorsYoung AdultGenderSpatial activitiesSpatial cognitionSTEM learning

Identifiers

PMID40138072
PMCPMC11947410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.