Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138037›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2025

Health shocks and health behavior: a long-term perspective.

Christian Bünnings, Irina Simankova, Harald Tauchmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian BünningsFOM Hochschule, Essen, Germany.
Irina SimankovaUniversität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany. irina.simankova@fau.de.
Harald TauchmannUniversität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several empirical papers suggest that individuals improve health-related behaviors in response to adverse shocks to physical health. However, little evidence exists regarding the questions of (i) how long-lasting these behavioral responses are and (ii) whether individuals respond similarly to mental health shocks. Using individual-level survey data from Germany and combining regression augmented inverse-probability weighting with machine learning prediction algorithms, we compare individuals hit by such shocks to undisturbed individuals up to fifteen years after that shock. The analysis confirms earlier findings that individuals experiencing a sharp deterioration of physical health immediately improve their health-related behaviors in terms of eating more healthily and being less likely to smoke. Contrarily, doing sports is negatively affected. We further find that the immediate response to shocks on mental health is weaker, with the exception of smoking. Tobacco consumption on average becomes more likely after a shock to mental health. We further find that the immediate response to shocks on mental health is weaker, with the exception of smoking behavior, which on average worsens after such kind of a shock. Yet the analysis does not reveal long lasting persistent effects. Significant differences in health behaviors are rarely found more than two years after the shock.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth StatusMental HealthAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedSmokingYoung AdultDouble/debiased machine learningHealth behaviorHealth shockLong-termMCSPCS

Identifiers

PMID40138037
PMCPMC12572051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.