ArticleMikrochimica acta2025
ZnO nanoflower-mediated paper-based electrochemical biosensor for perfect classification of cardiac biomarkers with physics-informed machine learning.
Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Electrochemical Sensing: A Network Evidence Map of Translational Barriers and Pathways to Point-of-Care Deployment.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Enhancement and optimization of a graphene-based biosensing platform using machine learning for precise breast cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Nanosensor Platforms for Non-Invasive Breathomic Diagnostics.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread exposure of acute myocardial infarction globally demands an ultrasensitive, rapid, and cost-effective biosensor for troponin-I and T in a dynamic concentration range. Traditionally, the saturation of sensor response limits accurate prediction at high analyte concentrations, although this is seldom discussed in the literature. To address this research gap, we thematically report physics-informed analytical treatments with machine learning (PIML) on a paper-based electrochemical biosensor, taking advantage of low cost, flexibility, low sample volume, and ease of deployment. Owing to the well-known biosensing performances, ZnO nanoflowers, synthesized in-house with a hydrothermal procedure, are utilized for transduction purposes with three voltametric techniques: CV, DPV, and SWV. The exceptional surface coverage and high IEP of ZnO have contributed towards the realization of high sensitivity, and the monoclonal antibody-based bioreceptors ensured the enormous selectivity of the platform. Nevertheless, the traditional calibration approach for CV considers the peak current as the sensor parameter, which gets flattened at higher concentrations, thereby limiting reliability. Therefore, this issue is addressed by strategic analytical development by extracting the charge associated with a CV scan and employing this physics-informed feature in the machine learning (ML) model. Combining features generated from different electrochemical techniques in the ML model enhances data diversity by including comprehensive information. This unique approach towards data analysis led to achieving 100% accuracy and AUC scores for identifying cardiac troponin-I and T multiclass concentrations. We strongly believe that the proposed methodologies have a substantial potential for translation to any other related sensor applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40138036What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.