Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40138035›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2025

The accuracy of different macrogeometry of dental implant in dynamic navigation guided immediate implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic zone: an in vitro study.

Jinyan Chen, Xinbo Yu, Yiqun Wu, Feng Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinyan Chen *Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 280, Mohe Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai, China.
Xinbo Yu *Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 280, Mohe Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai, China.
Yiqun WuSecond Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 280, Mohe Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai, China. yiqunwu@hotmail.com.
Feng WangDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 2B95, 2/F, OMFS, the Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Rd, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, China. diana_wangfeng@aliyun.com.

Funding

Clinician Scientist Cultivation Initiative of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital 2022YXYJXYS-WFInternational Team for Implantology 1781-2023Research Discipline fund from Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital KQYJXK2020Shanghai's Top Priority Research Center 2022ZZ01017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the accuracy of immediate implant placement (IIP) with different implant macrogeometry using a dynamic navigation in the maxillary aesthetic zone.

methodsSeventy-six extraction sockets in the maxillary aesthetic zone from nineteen partially edentulous models were randomly divided into four implant system groups with different macrogeometry: non-progressive and trapezoidal (NP-T), progressive and trapezoidal (P-T), progressive and V-shaped (P-V), progressive and spiral (P-S). The coronal, apical, and angular deviations of the fully guided implants with navigation were measured and compared among different groups.

resultsSignificant differences were detected in coronal, coronal buccolingual, coronal depth, apical, apical buccolingual, and apical depth deviations among the four groups (p = 0.035, p = 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.047, p = 0.007, p = 0.004, respectively). The P-V group demonstrated minimal coronal and apical buccolingual deviations (mean ± SD: 0.06 ± 0.35 mm and 0.00 ± 0.42 mm, respectively) for IIP with the guidance of dynamic navigation.

conclusionsWith the limitation of the in vitro study, different microgeometry of implants might influence the accuracy of IIP in the maxillary aesthetic zone with dynamic navigation. Implants with progressive and V-shaped thread designs perform best in reducing buccolingual deviations.

Indexed as

Dental Implantation, EndosseousDental ImplantsEsthetics, DentalImmediate Dental Implant LoadingMaxillaSurgery, Computer-AssistedHumansIn Vitro TechniquesDental ImplantsGuided implant surgeryImmediate implant placementImplantologyMacrogeometryNavigation

Identifiers

PMID40138035
PMCPMC11947383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.