ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Postsurgical follow-up and long-term monitoring of colorectal cancer : Radiology as a key component].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodological issueColorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Postsurgical follow-up and long-term monitoring are essential to detect local recurrence, metastases, or secondary tumors at an early stage. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsAccording to the current guideline on colorectal cancer, radiologic follow-up is primarily performed using a single computed tomography (CT) scan 3 months after completion of therapy. Annual chest X‑ray examinations within the first 5 years after completion of treatment can be employed, and, due to cost-effective availability, regular abdominal ultrasound is recommended. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: The German guideline on colorectal cancer is currently being revised. As the sensitivity of ultrasound is inferior to CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), thoracoabdominal CT will probably become crucial in follow-up care with the revised guideline, which would align with international recommendations. PERFORMANCE: CT is well suited for detecting local recurrence, as well as lung or liver metastases. MRI is used in assessing local cancer grades for treatment planning and monitoring. Structured reporting, stage- and guideline-based recommendations including follow-up intervals as well as interdisciplinary tumor conferences ensure high-quality follow-up care. ACHIEVEMENTS: Radiology is essential to interdisciplinary follow-up care for colorectal cancer. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Structured reporting and clear recommendations on follow-up intervals should be standard in radiological reports. The importance of radiological follow-up for patients with colorectal cancer is likely to increase further with the guideline that is currently being revised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40137989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.