ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2025
International Urogynecological Consultation Chapter 2.2: Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicompartmental prolapse: A comparative study between clinical examination and ultrasound.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Trial
- Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Versus Sacrocolpopexy: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Median 50-Month Patient-Reported and 14-Month Anatomical Outcomes.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Practical Recommendations for Acquisition and Reporting.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Multiparametric Pelvic-Floor Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Staging of Anterior-Compartment Clinical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- A Rare Case of Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse with Massive Perineal Hernia in a Nulliparous Woman: A Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- MR Defecography Improves Diagnosis of Postoperative Pelvic Floor Dysfunction After Gynecological Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThis section of Chapter 2.2 of the International Urogynecology Consultation on Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP), reviews the literature on the role of imaging in the diagnosis of POP.
methodsAn international group of nine urogynecologists and one university-based medical librarian adhered to the framework of the scoping review. The group performed a search of the literature using pre-specified search terms in Scopus, OVID Medline, and PubMed. Publications were eliminated if not relevant to the diagnostic value of POP imaging. The remaining articles were evaluated for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies. The resulting list of articles was used to perform a comprehensive narrative review of the diagnostic value of imaging modalities for the diagnosis of POP.
resultsThe original search yielded 3,289 references, 135 of which were used by the writing group.
conclusionsMost imaging studies utilized in the diagnoses of POP lacked standardization in the definition of POP. Most imaging studies lack standardization in the protocols used to diagnose POP within each imaging technique. Ultrasound- and MRI-related studies are most represented in the literature, compared with fewer CT- and X-ray-/fluoroscopy-related studies. Therefore, radiographic imaging is of limited value in the diagnosis of POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.