ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Characterizing the Preferred Retinal Locus and Fixation Stability in Diabetic Macular Ischemia: A One-Year Study.
Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eyes with maculopathy usually have poor fixation stability (FS) and develop a new preferred retinal locus (PRL). The exact FS and PRL have never been studied in diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). In this one-year observational study, we recruited 79 patients (145 eyes) with evidence of DMI on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Microperimetry (MP) was performed at baseline and 52 weeks. Overall, DMI eyes demonstrated relatively stable FS without evolving into eccentric fixation over one year. When comparing the better-seeing eye (BSE) with the worse-seeing eye (WSE) in eyes with bilateral DMI, the latter presented with a larger bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA) initially but gradually aligned with the one in the BSE at the end of the study. Conversely, the foveolar retinal sensitivity (RS) worsened significantly alongside the extension of disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) in the WSE at one year despite the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) being maintained. This suggests that foveolar RS might reflect the start of DMI deterioration more sensitively than BCVA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.