Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137930›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025

RELAY: Robotic EyeLink AnalYsis of the EyeLink 1000 Using an Artificial Eye.

Anna-Maria Felßberg, Dominykas Strazdas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna-Maria FelßbergMedical Faculty, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6651-5128
Dominykas StrazdasNeuro-Information Technology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0463-6781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of ambient brightness surroundings on the peak velocities of visually guided saccades remains a topic of debate in the field of eye-tracking research. While some studies suggest that saccades in darkness are slower than in light, others question this finding, citing inconsistencies influenced by factors such as pupil deformation during saccades, gaze position, or the measurement technique itself. To investigate these, we developed RELAY (Robotic EyeLink AnalYsis), a low-cost, stepper motor-driven artificial eye capable of simulating human saccades with controlled pupil, gaze directions, and brightness. Using the EyeLink 1000, a widely employed eye tracker, we assessed accuracy and precision across three illumination settings. Our results confirm the reliability of the EyeLink 1000, demonstrating no artifacts in pupil-based eye tracking related to brightness variations. This suggests that previously observed changes in peak velocities with varying brightness are likely due to human factors, warranting further investigation. However, we observed systematic deviations in measured pupil size depending on gaze direction. These findings emphasize the importance of reporting illumination conditions and gaze parameters in eye-tracking experiments to ensure data consistency and comparability. Our novel artificial eye provides a robust and reproducible platform for evaluating eye tracking systems and deepening our understanding of the human visual system.

Indexed as

accuracyartificial eyebrightnessEyeLink 1000eye trackinggazeP-CRpeak velocityprecisionsaccades

Identifiers

PMID40137930
PMCPMC11946672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.