ReviewToxins2025
Review: Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Focal Limb Dystonia.
Review in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Genetic Spectrum of ANO3-Related Dystonia with Treatment Responses in a Chinese Cohort.Genes · 2026Article
- Orthodontic considerations for managing patients with functional movement disorders: a narrative review and clinical guide.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal limb dystonias (FLDs) are abnormal postures and muscle contractions in an arm or leg that can occur in the setting of specific activities or without any stimulus. This pathology can have a profound impact on quality of life and potentially limit work in those whose dystonias are brought on by activities related to their occupations. Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is approved for use in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration for several indications, including cervical dystonia and blepharospasm, but not for FLD. Despite this limitation, BoNT is frequently used clinically for FLD, generally with individualized dosing based on patient need and clinician expertise. Various methods exist for targeting treatment to the specific affected muscles and assessing the benefit of treatment. Small clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of BoNT, but larger controlled studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.