ReviewToxins2025
Past, Current and Future Techniques for Monitoring Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in Bivalve Molluscs.
Review in Toxins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global epidemiology of paralytic shellfish poisoning: a systematic search literature review.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2025Pooled it
- Development of an Automated Cell-Based Assay for the Detection of the Functional Activity of Saxitoxin.Toxins · 2026Article
- Boron's Double Edge-Antibiotics, Toxins, and the Fine Line Between Them.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paralytic shellfish poisoning is a threat to human health caused by the consumption of shellfish contaminated with toxins of the saxitoxin class. Human health is protected by the setting of regulatory limits and the analysis of shellfish prior to sale. Both robust toxicity data, generated from experiments fitting into the ethical 3R framework, and appropriate analysis methods are required to ensure the success of this approach. A literature review of in vivo animal bioassays and in vitro and analytical methods showed that in vitro methods are the best option to screen shellfish for non-regulatory purposes. However, since neither the receptor nor antibody binding of paralytic shellfish toxin analogues correlate with toxicity, these assays cannot accurately quantify toxicity in shellfish nor be used to calculate toxicity equivalence factors. Fully replacing animals in testing is rightfully the ultimate goal, but this cannot be at a cost to human health. More modern technology, such as organ-on-a-chip, represent an exciting development, but animal bioassays cannot currently be replaced in the determination of toxicity. Analytical methods that employ toxicity equivalence factors calculated using oral animal toxicity data result in an accurate assessment of the food safety risk posed by paralytic shellfish toxin contamination in bivalve molluscs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.