Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137812›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Affective Responses to Barbell-Based Resistance Training in a 16-Week Barbell-Based Strength Training Program for Recreationally Active Adults.

Vanessa M Martinez Kercher, Janelle M Goss, Janette M Watkins, Liam A Phillips, Brad A Roy, James F Dow, Lilian Golzarri-Arroyo, Kyle A Kercher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vanessa M Martinez KercherDepartment of Health & Wellness Design, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0498-5279
Janelle M GossDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Janette M WatkinsDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-5968-8730
Liam A PhillipsUnited States Military Academy, Westpoint, NY 10996, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-9459-4200
Brad A RoyLogan Health Medical Center, Kalispell, MT 59901, USA.
James F DowBiostatistics Consulting Center, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Lilian Golzarri-ArroyoBiostatistics Consulting Center, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Kyle A KercherDepartment of Kinesiology, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4092-7113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the well-established physical benefits of resistance training (RT), only 31% of U.S. adults meet RT guidelines, with women participating at lower rates. While the physiological aspects of RT are well researched, less is known about the psychological factors, such as affective responses (e.g., enjoyment, energy). This study explored the relationships between self-efficacy, self-determined motivation, affective responses, and adherence in a 16-week barbell-based RT program.

methodsA prospective longitudinal study was conducted with 43 adults (M age = 45.09 ± 10.7, 81.8% female) enrolled in a community-based RT program. Affective responses were measured pre- and post-training, within RT sessions, and over time. Repeated-measures ANOVA and correlational analyses were used to examine relationships between psychological variables, affective responses, and adherence to the program.

resultsParticipants reported significant improvements in positive affective responses post-training and across the program's duration. Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation were positively associated with higher affective responses and greater adherence. Strength exercises elicited more positive affects compared to power exercises, and lifting heavier relative loads was correlated with more favorable emotional outcomes.

conclusionsThe study highlights the importance of psychological factors, such as self-efficacy and motivation, in the relationship of affective responses to RT.

Indexed as

affective responsesbarbell trainingstrength training

Identifiers

PMID40137812
PMCPMC11946861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.