Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137562›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025

ADMM-TransNet: ADMM-Based Sparse-View CT Reconstruction Method Combining Convolution and Transformer Network.

Sukai Wang, Xueqin Sun, Yu Li, Zhiqing Wei, Lina Guo, Yihong Li, Ping Chen, Xuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. X-ray data reconstruction from incomplete data sampling.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sukai WangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.
Xueqin SunShanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Detection Technology and Equipment, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.
Yu LiShanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Detection Technology and Equipment, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.
Zhiqing WeiShanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Detection Technology and Equipment, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.
Lina GuoShanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Detection Technology and Equipment, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4372-6218
Yihong LiDepartment of Mathematics, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.
Ping ChenShanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Detection Technology and Equipment, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.
Xuan LiShanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Detection Technology and Equipment, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.

Funding

Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Dynamic Measurement Technology, North University of China 2022-SYSJJ-08National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFE0205800National Nature Science Foundation of China U23A20285,62201520, 62301507, 62301508,62471442Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi, China 202203021212123, 202203021212455, 202303021222096, 202303021211149, 202302150401011Technology Development Fund Project of Shanxi Province under grant YDZJSX2024D037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundX-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging technology provides high-precision anatomical visualization of patients and has become a standard modality in clinical diagnostics. A widely adopted strategy to mitigate radiation exposure is sparse-view scanning. However, traditional iterative approaches require manual design of regularization priors and laborious parameter tuning, while deep learning methods either heavily depend on large datasets or fail to capture global image correlations.

methodsTherefore, this paper proposes a combination of model-driven and data-driven methods, using the ADMM iterative algorithm framework to constrain the network to reduce its dependence on data samples and introducing the CNN and Transformer model to increase the ability to learn the global and local representation of images, further improving the accuracy of the reconstructed image.

resultsThe quantitative and qualitative results show the effectiveness of our method for sparse-view reconstruction compared with the current most advanced reconstruction algorithms, achieving a PSNR of 42.036 dB, SSIM of 0.979, and MAE of 0.011 at 32 views.

conclusionsThe proposed algorithm has effective capability in sparse-view CT reconstruction. Compared with other deep learning algorithms, the proposed algorithm has better generalization and higher reconstruction accuracy.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPhantoms, ImagingADMMCNNCT reconstructionsparse-view CTtransformer

Identifiers

PMID40137562
PMCPMC11946640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.