ArticleToxics2025
A Quantitative and Comparative Study of Heroin-Related Metabolites in Different Postmortem Fluids and Tissues.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Evaluation of bladder wash for postmortem toxicological analysis: Comparison with urine in 50 forensic cases.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Analytical Methods for the Determination of Diamorphine (Heroin) in Biological Matrices: A Review.Toxics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study assessed and compared the postmortem concentrations of 6-monoacetylmorphine [6-MAM] and 6-acetylcodeine [6-AC], morphine, and codeine in various tissues and fluids from 52 postmortem cases related to heroin use. Samples were received at the Poison Control and Forensic Chemistry Center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including median, range, variability, and outliers, were used for analysis. The results showed significant variability in heroin and metabolite concentrations across different fluids and tissues. Tissue specimens were analyzed in 38 cases (73%), with 50% of cases exhibiting putrefaction. Blood and tissue samples were available in 39 cases, highlighting the need for alternative specimens in challenging cases. Notably, heroin metabolites were detected in unique matrices, such as nasal swabs, bladder tissues, lung tissues, and small intestine tissues, underscoring the potential of these samples in forensic investigations, especially when traditional bodily fluids are unavailable or compromised. These findings suggest that environmental factors, timing of substance use, and postmortem changes influence substance distribution, emphasizing the need to consider the location of death when interpreting toxicological results for accurate forensic analysis. This study provides valuable insights into the distribution, correlation, and significance of heroin and its metabolites in postmortem samples, aiding the confirmation of heroin overdose. These findings contribute to the limited data on postmortem cases in the Middle East and North Africa, particularly Saudi Arabia, supporting efforts to curb drug abuse in this region. This knowledge can inform public health strategies and forensic practices, ultimately aiding efforts to address and mitigate drug abuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.