Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137552›Full record

ArticleToxics2025

Progestin Pollution in Surface Waters of a Major Southwestern European Estuary: The Douro River Estuary (Iberian Peninsula).

Frederico Silva, Rodrigo F Alves, Eduardo Rocha, Maria João Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Frederico SilvaDepartment of Microscopy, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto (U. Porto), 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5187-3723
Rodrigo F AlvesDepartment of Microscopy, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto (U. Porto), 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Eduardo RochaDepartment of Microscopy, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto (U. Porto), 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-4389
Maria João RochaDepartment of Microscopy, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto (U. Porto), 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-8033

Funding

FCT- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, through the strategic funding given to CIIMAR UIDB/04423/2020 and UIDP/04423/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concentrations and spreading of eight synthetic and two natural progestins (PGs) were investigated in surface waters from ten sites at the Douro River Estuary. Samples were filtrated and subjected to solid-phase extraction (SPE) to isolate and concentrate the target PGs. The extracts were cleaned by silica cartridges and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The finding of biologically relevant amounts of gonanes (22.3 ± 2.7 ng/L), progesterone derivatives (12.2 ± 0.5 ng/L), drospirenone (4.1 ± 0.8 ng/L), and natural PGs (9.4 ± 0.9 ng/L) support the possibility of these compounds acting as endocrine disruptors. Despite the absence of significant differences amongst sampling sites and seasons, the principal component analysis (PCA) and the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) approaches reveal that spring and summer have different patterns of PG distribution compared to autumn and winter. The assessment of risk coefficients (

Indexed as

aquatic toxicologygonanesprogesterone derivativesprogestogenrisk quotients (RQs)spirolactone derivatives

Identifiers

PMID40137552
PMCPMC11946473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.