ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025
Precision Surgery for Glioblastomas.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Illuminating glioma surgery: A meta-analysis of Raman spectroscopy for intraoperative decision-making.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Label-free wide-field imaging of brain tumors using near-infrared endogenous fluorescence and reflectance normalization.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Supramaximal resection in gliomas: a narrative review of surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, and ethical considerations.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma Multiforme: Current Developments in Molecular Pathways, Magnetic Field-Based Interventions, and Personalized Therapy.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumor. Most of the recent improvements their treatment are due to improvements in surgery. Although many would consider surgery as the most personalized treatment, the variation in resection between surgeons suggests there remains a need for objective measures to determine the best surgical treatment for individualizing therapy for glioblastoma. We propose applying a personalized medicine approach to improve outcomes for patients. We suggest looking at personalizing preoperative preparation, improving the resection target by understanding what needs removing and what ca not be removed, and better patient selection with personalized rehabilitation plans for all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.