ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Formulating Mechanically Robust Composite Restorative Materials for High Performance.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-Art Dental Adhesives and Restorative Composites.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Bioactive Fillers in Bulk-Fill Composite Resins: A Comprehensive Review of the Effects on Polymerization Shrinkage Behavior and Mechanical Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advanced Biomaterials for Restorative Dentistry: From Biocompatibility to Bioactive and Smart Materials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although dental resin composite restoratives offer a widely used direct-placement treatment option aimed at replacing the form and function of a natural tooth, there are several clinically relevant performance aspects of these materials that can be improved. The formulation of the resin matrix phase of dental composites for high-efficiency photopolymerization leading to polymers with excellent mechanical properties has always been a challenge that is addressed here through the use of structurally new and more reactive monomers as well as the formation of polymer networks that incorporate non-covalent reinforcing interactions. The purpose of this study was to validate that a set of tetraurethane diacrylates (TUDAs) with a novel configuration of their urethane linkages in coordination with acidic comonomers could be devised to obtain highly robust new composite materials. Due to the novel molecular design, this exploratory approach was conducted using reaction kinetics and three-point bend testing to assess the performance. Conversion and mechanical properties were measured to refine these formulations prior to the addition of filler. The initial formulations demonstrated outstanding dry mechanical test results that subsequently showed a major intolerance to water storage, which led to a model study using urethane diacrylate (UDA) followed by the addition of hydrophobic TUDA monomers. Once the resin formulations were optimized, silane-treated particulate filler was added to determine the effectiveness as composite materials. The final formulation used a hydrophobic, aromatic TUDA along with 4-methacryloxyethyl trimellitic anhydride (4-META) as a latent acidic comonomer and a mixture of acrylic acid (AA) and methacrylic acid (MAA). This formulation achieves a very high level of both reactivity and mechanical properties relative to current dental composite restoratives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.