ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Cu-MOF-Decorated 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Infection Control and Bone Regeneration.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cu-based metal-organic frameworks: synthesis, biomedical applications, and beyond.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Converging chemistry and clinical orthopedics in the emerging role of MOFs in advanced bone defect repair.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Synthesis and antibacterial properties of magnesium-based curcumin self-assembled material.Current research in food science · 2026Article
- Insights and advances of theranostic nanoscale metal-organic frameworks.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Metal-organic frameworks for biomedical applications: bridging materials science and regenerative medicine.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Synergistic Angio-Osteogenic Effects of Copper-Releasing 3D Biocomposite Scaffolds: A Step Toward Vascularized Bone Regeneration.Research square · 2025Article
- Functionalized metal-organic framework and MOF-derived materials for bone regeneration applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infection control and bone regeneration remain critical challenges in bone defect treatment. We developed a 3D-printed scaffold incorporating copper-based metal-organic framework-74 (Cu-MOF-74) within a polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite composite. The synthesized Cu-MOF-74 exhibited a well-defined crystalline structure and rod-like morphology, as confirmed by TEM, EDS, FTIR, and XRD analyses. The scaffolds exhibited hierarchical pores (100-200 μm) and demonstrated tunable hydrophilicity, as evidenced by the water contact angles decreasing from 103.3 ± 2.02° (0% Cu-MOF-74) to 63.60 ± 1.93° (1% Cu-MOF-74). A biphasic Cu
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.