Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137358›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025

Blood Plasma, Fibrinogen or Fibrin Biomaterial for the Manufacturing of Skin Tissue-Engineered Products and Other Dermatological Treatments: A Systematic Review.

Álvaro Sierra-Sánchez, Raquel Sanabria-de la Torre, Ana Ubago-Rodríguez, María I Quiñones-Vico, Trinidad Montero-Vílchez, Manuel Sánchez-Díaz, Salvador Arias-Santiago

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Novel Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Álvaro Sierra-SánchezUnidad de Producción Celular e Ingeniería Tisular, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Andalusian Network of Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4511-408X
Raquel Sanabria-de la TorreUnidad de Producción Celular e Ingeniería Tisular, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Andalusian Network of Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3261-6745
Ana Ubago-RodríguezUnidad de Producción Celular e Ingeniería Tisular, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Andalusian Network of Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies, 18014 Granada, Spain.
María I Quiñones-VicoUnidad de Producción Celular e Ingeniería Tisular, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Andalusian Network of Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-1017
Trinidad Montero-VílchezInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4035-7955
Manuel Sánchez-DíazInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, 18012 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3626-1558
Salvador Arias-SantiagoUnidad de Producción Celular e Ingeniería Tisular, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Andalusian Network of Design and Translation of Advanced Therapies, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-1435

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI17/02083 and FI18/00269Regional Government of Andalusia PIGE-0242-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of blood plasma, fibrinogen or fibrin, a natural biomaterial, has been widely studied for the development of different skin tissue-engineered products and other dermatological treatments. This systematic review reports the preclinical and clinical studies which use it alone or combined with other biomaterials and/or cells for the treatment of several dermatological conditions. Following the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines, 147 preclinical studies have revealed that the use of this biomaterial as a wound dressing or as a monolayer (one cell type) skin substitute are the preferred strategies, mainly for the treatment of excisional or surgical wounds. Moreover, blood plasma is mainly used alone although its combination with other biomaterials such as agarose, polyethylene glycol or collagen has also been reported to increase its wound healing potential. However, most of the 17 clinical reviewed evaluated its use for the treatment of severely burned patients as a wound dressing or bilayer (two cell types) skin substitute. Although the number of preclinical studies evaluating the use of blood plasma as a dermatological treatment has increased during the last fifteen years, this has not been correlated with a wide variety of clinical studies. Its safety and wound healing potential have been proved; however, the lack of a standard model and the presence of several approaches have meant that its translation to a clinical environment is still limited. A higher number of clinical studies should be carried out in the coming years to set a standard wound healing strategy for each dermatological disease.

Indexed as

biomaterialblood plasmafibrinfibrinogenscaffoldtissue-engineered skin substitute

Identifiers

PMID40137358
PMCPMC11942893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.