ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Integrating Machine Learning into Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Biomaterials: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The global increase in osteomuscular diseases, particularly bone defects and fractures, has driven the growing demand for metallic implants. Additive manufacturing (AM) has emerged as a transformative technology for producing high-precision metallic biomaterials with customized properties, offering significant advantages over traditional manufacturing methods. The integration of machine learning (ML) with AM has shown great promise in optimizing the fabrication process, enhancing material performance, and predicting long-term behavior, particularly in the development of orthopedic implants and vascular stents. This review explores the application of ML in AM of metallic biomaterials, focusing on four key areas: (1) component design, where ML guides the optimization of multi-component alloys for improved mechanical and biological properties; (2) structural design, enabling the creation of intricate porous architectures tailored to specific functional requirements; (3) process control, facilitating real-time monitoring and adjustment of manufacturing parameters; and (4) parameter optimization, which reduces costs and enhances production efficiency. This review offers a comprehensive overview of four key aspects, presenting relevant research and providing an in-depth analysis of the current state of ML-guided AM techniques for metallic biomaterials. It enables readers to gain a thorough understanding of the latest advancements in this field. Additionally, the this review addresses the challenges in predicting
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.