Article in Marine drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Chenxi GuGuangxi Key Laboratory for Polysaccharide Materials and Modifications, School of Marine Sciences and Biotechnology, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530008, China.
Jianrong ChenNational Key Laboratory of Non-Food Biomass Energy Technology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Natural Products and Combinatorial Biosynthesis Chemistry, Guangxi Academy of Marine Sciences, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning 530007, China.
Xinyue HuangGuangxi Key Laboratory for Polysaccharide Materials and Modifications, School of Marine Sciences and Biotechnology, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530008, China.
Yongqiang JiangInstitute of Biology, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning 530007, China.
Na OuInstitute of Biology, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning 530007, China.
Dengfeng YangNational Key Laboratory of Non-Food Biomass Energy Technology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Natural Products and Combinatorial Biosynthesis Chemistry, Guangxi Academy of Marine Sciences, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning 530007, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0596-6157
Mingguo JiangGuangxi Key Laboratory for Polysaccharide Materials and Modifications, School of Marine Sciences and Biotechnology, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530008, China.
Lixia PanNational Key Laboratory of Non-Food Biomass Energy Technology, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Marine Natural Products and Combinatorial Biosynthesis Chemistry, Guangxi Academy of Marine Sciences, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning 530007, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9360-5492
Funding
Basic Science and Research Foundation of Guangxi Academy of Sciences CQ-C-202302Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Project AD23023007Innovation and Development fund of Guangxi Academy of Sciences No.2024YGFZ504-103National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 32360227National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 32360244Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi Guike AA24206048
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The chitinase binding domain (ChBD) plays a crucial role in the properties of enzymes. To assess its impact, we cloned a truncated mutant of the chitinase gene
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The Impact of Chitinase Binding Domain Truncation on the Properties of · full record | OpenQuestion