Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137203›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2025

Machine Learning for Human Activity Recognition: State-of-the-Art Techniques and Emerging Trends.

Md Amran Hossen, Pg Emeroylariffion Abas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Md Amran HossenFaculty of Integrated Technologies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan BE 1410, Brunei.ORCID 0000-0003-4862-5803
Pg Emeroylariffion AbasFaculty of Integrated Technologies, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan BE 1410, Brunei.ORCID 0000-0002-7006-3838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) has emerged as a transformative field with widespread applications, leveraging diverse sensor modalities to accurately identify and classify human activities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of HAR techniques, focusing on the integration of sensor-based, vision-based, and hybrid methodologies. It explores the strengths and limitations of commonly used modalities, such as RGB images/videos, depth sensors, motion capture systems, wearable devices, and emerging technologies like radar and Wi-Fi channel state information. The review also discusses traditional machine learning approaches, including supervised and unsupervised learning, alongside cutting-edge advancements in deep learning, such as convolutional and recurrent neural networks, attention mechanisms, and reinforcement learning frameworks. Despite significant progress, HAR still faces critical challenges, including handling environmental variability, ensuring model interpretability, and achieving high recognition accuracy in complex, real-world scenarios. Future research directions emphasise the need for improved multimodal sensor fusion, adaptive and personalised models, and the integration of edge computing for real-time analysis. Additionally, addressing ethical considerations, such as privacy and algorithmic fairness, remains a priority as HAR systems become more pervasive. This study highlights the evolving landscape of HAR and outlines strategies for future advancements that can enhance the reliability and applicability of HAR technologies in diverse domains.

Indexed as

activity discoveryactivity recognitiondata fusiondeep learningemerging applicationsmachine learningsensor modalities

Identifiers

PMID40137203
PMCPMC11943402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.