ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Machine Learning for Human Activity Recognition: State-of-the-Art Techniques and Emerging Trends.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Style-Semantic Disentangled Optical-to-Infrared Translation for Infrared Target Recognition.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Application of PoseConv3D algorithm in cheerleading training action recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of oxygen uptake in dragon boat athletes using machine learning and multimodal physiological signals.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Enhanced spatiotemporal skeleton modeling: integrating part-joint attention with dynamic graph convolution.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human activity recognition (HAR) has emerged as a transformative field with widespread applications, leveraging diverse sensor modalities to accurately identify and classify human activities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of HAR techniques, focusing on the integration of sensor-based, vision-based, and hybrid methodologies. It explores the strengths and limitations of commonly used modalities, such as RGB images/videos, depth sensors, motion capture systems, wearable devices, and emerging technologies like radar and Wi-Fi channel state information. The review also discusses traditional machine learning approaches, including supervised and unsupervised learning, alongside cutting-edge advancements in deep learning, such as convolutional and recurrent neural networks, attention mechanisms, and reinforcement learning frameworks. Despite significant progress, HAR still faces critical challenges, including handling environmental variability, ensuring model interpretability, and achieving high recognition accuracy in complex, real-world scenarios. Future research directions emphasise the need for improved multimodal sensor fusion, adaptive and personalised models, and the integration of edge computing for real-time analysis. Additionally, addressing ethical considerations, such as privacy and algorithmic fairness, remains a priority as HAR systems become more pervasive. This study highlights the evolving landscape of HAR and outlines strategies for future advancements that can enhance the reliability and applicability of HAR technologies in diverse domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.