ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Advances in Optical Contrast Agents for Medical Imaging: Fluorescent Probes and Molecular Imaging.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential of Silver Nanoparticles in Imaging Diagnostics and Image-Guided Applications: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Amplified Light Absorption with Nanomaterials for Enhanced Photoacoustic Imaging in Biomedical Research: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances and Opportunities in NIR-II Endoscopy: From Diagnosis to Therapeutic Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Biomedical Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical imaging is an excellent non-invasive method for viewing visceral organs. Most importantly, it is safer as compared to ionizing radiation-based methods like X-rays. By making use of the properties of photons, this technique generates high-resolution images of cells, molecules, organs, and tissues using visible, ultraviolet, and infrared light. Moreover, optical imaging enables real-time evaluation of soft tissue properties, metabolic alterations, and early disease markers in real time by utilizing a variety of techniques, including fluorescence and bioluminescence. Innovative biocompatible fluorescent probes that may provide disease-specific optical signals are being used to improve diagnostic capabilities in a variety of clinical applications. However, despite these promising advancements, several challenges remain unresolved. The primary obstacle includes the difficulty of developing efficient fluorescent probes, and the tissue autofluorescence, which complicates signal detection. Furthermore, the depth penetration restrictions of several imaging modalities limit their use in imaging of deeper tissues. Additionally, enhancing biocompatibility, boosting fluorescent probe signal-to-noise ratios, and utilizing cutting-edge imaging technologies like machine learning for better image processing should be the main goals of future research. Overcoming these challenges and establishing optical imaging as a fundamental component of modern medical diagnoses and therapeutic treatments would require cooperation between scientists, physicians, and regulatory bodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.