Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137195›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

Battle Royale Optimization for Optimal Band Selection in Predicting Soil Nutrients Using Visible and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy and PLSR Algorithm.

Jagadeeswaran Ramasamy, Anand Raju, Kavitha Krishnasamy Ranganathan, Muthumanickam Dhanaraju, Backiyathu Saliha, Kumaraperumal Ramalingam, Sathishkumar Samiappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jagadeeswaran RamasamyDepartment of Remote Sensing and GIS, CWGS TamilNadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8658-9260
Anand RajuDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore 641112, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1558-4577
Kavitha Krishnasamy RanganathanDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sona College of Technology, Salem 636005, India.
Muthumanickam DhanarajuDepartment of Remote Sensing and GIS, CWGS TamilNadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, India.
Backiyathu SalihaAgricultural Research Station, TamilNadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Kovilpatti 628502, India.
Kumaraperumal RamalingamDepartment of Remote Sensing and GIS, CWGS TamilNadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641003, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6659-9587
Sathishkumar SamiappanDepartment of Biosystems Engineering & Soil Science, University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-883X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An attempt was made to quantify soil properties using hyperspectral remote-sensing techniques and machine-learning algorithms. In total, 100 soil samples representing various locations and soil-nutrient statuses were collected, and the samples were analyzed for soil pH, EC, soil organic carbon, available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK) by following standard methods. Soil had a wide range of properties, i.e., pH varied from 5.62 to 8.49, EC varied from 0.08 to 1.78 dS/m, soil organic carbon varied from 0.23 to 0.94%, available nitrogen varied from 154 to 344 kg/ha, available phosphorus varied from 9.5 to 25.5 kg/ha, and available potassium varied from 131 to 747 kg/ha. The same set of soil samples were subjected to spectral reflectance measurement using SVC GER 1500 Spectroradiometer (spectral range: 350 to 1050 nm). The measured spectral signatures of various soils were organized for developing a spectral library and for deriving various spectral indices to correlate with soil properties to quantify the nutrients. The soil samples were partitioned into 60:40 ratios for training and validation, respectively. In order to select optimum bands (wavelength) from the soil spectra, we have employed metaheuristic algorithms i.e., Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Moth-Flame optimization (MFO), Flower Pollination Optimization (FPO), and Battle Royale Optimization (BRO) algorithm. Further partial least square regression (PLSR) was used to find the latent variable and to evaluate various algorithms for their performance in predicting soil properties. The results indicated that nutrients could be quantified from spectral reflectance measurement with fair to good accuracy through the Battle Royale Optimization technique with a R2 value of 0.45, 0.32, 0.48, 0.21, 0.71, and 0.35 for pH, EC, soil organic carbon, available-N, available-P, and available-K, respectively.

Indexed as

BROmachine-learning approachPLSRsoil propertiesspectral techniques

Identifiers

PMID40137195
PMCPMC11943028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.