ArticleJournal of imaging2025
A Novel Method to Compute the Contact Surface Area Between an Organ and Cancer Tissue.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond traditional nephrometry: a 3D quantitative framework for predicting pentafecta and evaluating mediation effects in nephron-sparing surgery.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Virtual Model for Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN): Development of Study Protocol for Evaluation of the Learning Curve to Optimize the Precision and Accuracy of the 3D Imaging.Research and reports in urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contact surface area (CSA) quantifies the interface between a tumor and an organ and is a key predictor of perioperative outcomes in kidney cancer. However, existing CSA computation methods rely on shape assumptions and manual annotation. We propose a novel approach using 3D reconstructions from computed tomography (CT) scans to provide an accurate CSA estimate. Our method includes a segmentation protocol and an algorithm that processes reconstructed meshes. We also provide an open-source implementation with a graphical user interface. Tested on synthetic data, the algorithm showed minimal error and was evaluated on data from 82 patients. We computed the CSA using both our approach and Hsieh's method, which relies on subjective CT scan measurements, in a double-blind study with two radiologists of different experience levels. We assessed the correlation between our approach and the expert radiologist's measurements, as well as the deviation of both our method and the less experienced radiologist from the expert's values. While the mean and variance of the differences between the less experienced radiologist and the expert were lower, our method exhibited a slight deviation from the expert's, demonstrating its reliability and consistency. These findings are further supported by the results obtained from synthetic data testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.