Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137104›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

Myocardial Viability: Evolving Insights and Challenges in Revascularization and Functional Recovery.

Kristoffer Ken Ralota, Jamie Layland, Kyi Thar Han Win, Nay M Htun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristoffer Ken RalotaDepartment of Cardiology, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-8261-6222
Jamie LaylandDepartment of Cardiology, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.
Kyi Thar Han WinDepartment of Cardiology, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.
Nay M HtunDepartment of Cardiology, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of heart failure, driven significantly by ischemic heart disease, continues to rise globally. Myocardial viability-the potential ability of dysfunctional myocardium to recover contractile function after revascularization-remains an ongoing key area of research in managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. Advances in imaging modalities, including PET/SPECT, cardiac MRI, and dobutamine stress echocardiography, have enabled identification of viable myocardium that can potentially predict their functional recovery following revascularization. Despite these advances, recent evidence from major trials questions the routine reliance on viability testing for revascularization guidance. These studies found a limited correlation between myocardial viability and improved outcomes in key metrics including mortality. Furthermore, they highlighted the effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy in improving left ventricular function independent of revascularization. This narrative review explores the concept of myocardial viability, its assessment through contemporary imaging techniques, its clinical utility in decision making for revascularization, and future directions.

Indexed as

cardiac imagingheart failurehibernating myocardiumischemic cardiomyopathyleft ventricular dysfunctionmyocardial stunningmyocardial viability

Identifiers

PMID40137104
PMCPMC11943439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.