ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Myocardial Viability: Evolving Insights and Challenges in Revascularization and Functional Recovery.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The interplay between recovery and immunity in infectious and non-communicable diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- The Contemporary Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of heart failure, driven significantly by ischemic heart disease, continues to rise globally. Myocardial viability-the potential ability of dysfunctional myocardium to recover contractile function after revascularization-remains an ongoing key area of research in managing ischemic cardiomyopathy. Advances in imaging modalities, including PET/SPECT, cardiac MRI, and dobutamine stress echocardiography, have enabled identification of viable myocardium that can potentially predict their functional recovery following revascularization. Despite these advances, recent evidence from major trials questions the routine reliance on viability testing for revascularization guidance. These studies found a limited correlation between myocardial viability and improved outcomes in key metrics including mortality. Furthermore, they highlighted the effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy in improving left ventricular function independent of revascularization. This narrative review explores the concept of myocardial viability, its assessment through contemporary imaging techniques, its clinical utility in decision making for revascularization, and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.