ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Exploring the Current Status of Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: From Risk Models to Promising Techniques.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complication management in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Enhancing risk prediction for sudden cardiac death: quantitative late gadolinium enhancement analysis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- A bibliometric and visual analysis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: 2000-2025.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Current trends in virtual electrophysiology use for risk stratification and treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving clinical prediction of sudden cardiac death is a crucial step in the management of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, finding the optimal method for risk evaluation has been challenging, given the complexity and the wide variation in clinical phenotypes. This is particularly important, as these patients are often of younger age and defibrillator implantation is associated with a low but tangible long-term risk of adverse events. A number of risk factors, including degree of hypertrophy, presence of syncope and family history of sudden cardiac death, have typically been considered to indicate a higher risk. The European risk score for prediction of sudden cardiac death is widely used; however, it may not apply well in patients with specific forms of the condition, such as those with extreme hypertrophy. Increasing evidence suggests that the presence and extent of myocardial fibrosis assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging should be considered in clinical decision-making. Some research suggests that integrating electrophysiological studies into traditional risk assessment models may further optimize risk prediction and significantly improve accuracy in detecting high risk patients. Novel cardiac imaging techniques, better understanding of the genetic substrate and artificial intelligence-based algorithms may prove promising for risk refinement. The present review article provides an updated and in-depth viewpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.