Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137058›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2025

Bayesian Estimation of Generalized Log-Linear Poisson Item Response Models for Fluency Scores Using brms and Stan.

Nils Myszkowski, Martin Storme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nils MyszkowskiDepartment of Psychology, Pace University, New York, NY 10004, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1322-0777
Martin StormeIESEG School of Management, Université de Lille, CNRS, UMR 9221-LEM-Lille Economie Management, 59000 Lille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8455-120X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Divergent thinking tests are popular instruments to measure a person's creativity. They often involve scoring fluency, which refers to the count of ideas generated in response to a prompt. The two-parameter Poisson counts model (2PPCM), a generalization of the Rasch Poisson counts model (RPCM) that includes discrimination parameters, has been proposed as a useful approach to analyze fluency scores in creativity tasks, but its estimation was presented in the context of generalized structural equation modeling (GSEM) commercial software (e.g., Mplus). Here, we show how the 2PPCM (and RPCM) can be estimated in a Bayesian multilevel regression framework and interpreted using the R package brms, which provides an interface for the Stan programming language. We illustrate this using an example dataset, which contains fluency scores for three tasks and 202 participants. We discuss model specification, estimation, convergence, fit and comparisons. Furthermore, we provide instructions on plotting item response functions, comparing models, calculating overdispersion and reliability, as well as extracting factor scores.

Indexed as

Bayesian estimationcreativitydivergent thinkingfluencyitem response theorypsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID40137058
PMCPMC11943404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.