ReviewMembranes2025
Fouling of Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Nanofiltration (NF) Membranes by Low Molecular Weight Organic Compounds (LMWOCs), Part 2: Countermeasures and Applications.
Review in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Study on the Recycling of Sodium Citrate (NaMembranes · 2026Article
- Article
- Selective Separation of Inorganic and Organic Carbonates in Aqueous Solutions by Reverse Osmosis (RO) and Nanofiltration (NF) Membranes.Membranes · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Membrane Technologies for Electronic-Grade Hydrogen Peroxide Purification and Concentration.Membranes · 2026Review
- Application of membrane processes for expressway rainwater runoff treatment and reuse.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fouling, particularly from organic fouling and biofouling, poses a significant challenge in the RO/NF treatment of marginal waters, especially wastewater. Part 1 of this review detailed LMWOC fouling mechanisms. Part 2 focuses on countermeasures and applications. Effective fouling prevention relies on pretreatment, early detection, cleaning, optimized operation, and in situ membrane modification. Accurate fouling prediction is crucial. Preliminary tests using flat-sheet membranes or small-diameter modules are recommended. Currently, no specific fouling index exists for LMWOC fouling. Hydrophobic membranes, such as polyamide, are proposed as alternatives to the standard silt density index (SDI) filter. Once LMWOC fouling potential is assessed, suitable pretreatment methods can be implemented. These include adsorbents, specialized water filters, oxidative decomposition, and antifoulants. In situations where pretreatment is impractical, alternative strategies like high pH operation might be considered. Membrane cleaning becomes necessary upon fouling; however, standard cleaning often fails to fully restore the original flow. Specialized CIP chemicals, including organic solvent-based and oxidative agents, are required. Conversely, LMWOC fouling typically leads to a stabilized flow rate reduction rather than a continuous decline. Aggressive cleaning may be avoided if the resulting operating pressure increase is acceptable. When a significant flow rate drop occurs and LMWOC fouling is suspected, analysis of the fouled membrane is necessary for identification. Standard FT-IR often fails to detect LMWOCs. Solvent extraction followed by GC-MS is required. Pyrolysis GC-MS, which eliminates the extraction step, shows promise. The review concludes by examining how LMWOCs can be strategically utilized to enhance membrane rejection and restore deteriorated membranes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.