ArticleMembranes2025
Comparison of Different Polymeric Membranes in Direct Contact Membrane Distillation and Air Gap Membrane Distillation Configurations.
Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance Assessment of a Hybrid Solar-Driven Photocatalysis-Membrane Distillation Process for the Removal of Ketoprofen from Seawater.Membranes · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Non-Stagnant Water Gap in Hollow-Fiber Membrane Distillation and Multistage Performance Limitations.Membranes · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Membrane distillation (MD) is an evolving thermal separation technique most frequently aimed at water desalination, compatible with low-grade heat sources such as waste heat from thermal engines, solar collectors, and high-concentration photovoltaic panels. This study presents a comprehensive theoretical-experimental evaluation of three commercial membranes of different materials (PE, PVDF, and PTFE), tested for two distinct MD modules-a Direct Contact Membrane Distillation (DCMD) module and an Air Gap Membrane Distillation (AGMD) module-analyzing the impact of key operational parameters on the performance of the individual membranes in each configuration. The results showed that increasing the feed saline concentration from 7 g/L to 70 g/L led to distillate flux reductions of 12.2% in the DCMD module and 42.9% in the AGMD one, averaged over the whole set of experiments. The increase in feed temperature from 65 °C to 85 °C resulted in distillate fluxes up to 2.36 times higher in the DCMD module and 2.70 times higher in the AGMD one. The PE-made membrane demonstrated the highest distillate fluxes, while the PVDF and PTFE membranes exhibited superior performance under high-salinity conditions in the AGMD module. Membranes with high contact angles, such as PTFE with 143.4°, performed better under high salinity conditions. Variations in operational parameters, such as flow rate and temperature, markedly affect the temperature and concentration polarization effects. The analyses underscored the necessity of a careful selection of membrane type for each distillation configuration by the specific characteristics of the process and its operational conditions. In addition to experimental findings, the proposed heat and mass transfer-reduced model showed good agreement with experimental data, with deviations within ±15%, effectively capturing the influence of operational parameters. Theoretical predictions showed good agreement with experimental data, confirming the model's validity, which can be applied to optimization methodologies to improve the membrane distillation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.