Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40137009›Full record

ReviewEuropean burn journal2025

Novel Techniques in Fractional Skin Replacement.

Courtney Kelly, Rodney K Chan, Anders H Carlsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European burn journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Courtney KellyOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78216, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-8577-9622
Rodney K ChanUS Army Burn Center, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78216, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5061-847X
Anders H CarlssonThe Metis Foundation, San Antonio, TX 78216, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4846-108X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standards for coverage of wounds that cannot be primarily closed are full thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) and split thickness skins graft (STSGs). FTSGs harvest sites generally require primary closure, which limits availability, especially when treating larger wounds. STSGs have many shortcomings, including donor site morbidity. Fractional autologous skin replacement can be utilized in conjunction with or in lieu of STSGs to both improve graft outcomes of large wounds and to decrease donor site morbidity. Skin can be mechanically or chemically fractionated. Fractionated skin can be advantageous, as adnexal structures provide additional functionality without donor site morbidity. In this review, we will discuss current and emerging techniques in fractional skin replacement.

Indexed as

ART devicecutaneous woundexpansion ratiofractional autologous skin graftfull thickness burnfull thickness skin columnfull thickness skin graftmicrograftpartial thickness burnpixel graftRECELLRECELL-GOsplit thickness skin graftXpansion

Identifiers

PMID40137009
PMCPMC11941591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.